Introducing the NEW Optibot AppSec Agent - now live.

Free Tool

Claude Code Review Cost Calculator

Enter your team size and PR volume. See your estimated monthly Claude Code Review spend vs. Optibot's flat $29/user/month, in seconds.

Optibot

$290

per month · $29/user · flat rate

Claude Code Reviews

$4,800

per month · token-based est.

Adjust for your team

Engineers

10

Team size

150100

PRs / eng / week

8

Avg per engineer

11530

Claude / review

$15

Token cost est. per PR

$10$17$25

You save with Optibot

$54.1k

per year · $4,510 / month

Break-even: less than 1 PR/eng/week at $15/review

80

PRS/WK

320

PRS/MO

16.6×

CHEAPER

How we calculate: Team size x PRs per engineer per week x 4 working weeks x cost per Claude Code Review. Claude Code Review (Anthropic's GitHub integration) charges $10-$25 per PR depending on diff size and complexity. Optibot is $29 per user per month — flat rate, unlimited reviews, billed annually.

Quick answer

Claude Code Review (Anthropic's GitHub integration) charges $10 to $25 per PR review, with higher costs for complex diffs and no cap. A 10-engineer team opening 8 PRs per week pays roughly $3,200 to $8,000 per month. Optibot charges $29 per user per month (billed annually) with unlimited reviews, $290 per month for the same team. The break-even is less than one PR per engineer per week.

How much does Claude Code cost per code review?

Claude Code Review is Anthropic's GitHub integration for automated PR reviews. It charges $10 to $25 per PR review, more for large diffs and complex multi-file changes. For a team of 10 engineers submitting 8 PRs each per week, that is roughly $3,200 to $8,000 per month, before any other Claude usage.

The calculator above uses $15 per PR as a mid-range estimate. Adjust the cost-per-review slider to model what your team actually sees based on your typical diff sizes.

Is Optibot cheaper than Claude Code Review?

Yes, for almost any team. Optibot charges a flat $29 per user per month (billed annually) with unlimited reviews and no per-PR fees. For a 10-person team that is $290 per month regardless of how many PRs they ship. The break-even against Claude Code Review is typically less than one PR per engineer per week.

Beyond cost, Optibot runs structured multi-pass reviews with persistent codebase context, catching 2x more breaking changes and understanding business logic across files.

Recommended

Optibot

Flat rate

Comparing

Claude Code Review

Per review

Pricing model
Flat rate
Per review
Price
$29 / user / month
$10-$25 per PR
Reviews included
Unlimited
Pay per review
Break-even
N/A
< 1 PR/eng/week
10 engineers · 8 PRs/wk
$290 / month
~$4,800+ / month
Cost predictability
Fully predictable
Varies with diff size
Codebase context
Multi-pass, persistent
No native context

How do I reduce my Claude Code token spend on reviews?

  • Switch to a flat-rate reviewer. Replace per-token reviews with Optibot's $29/user/month plan. Savings scale linearly with PR volume and become significant fast.
  • Install the Optibot Claude Code Skill. This routes code review calls through Optibot instead of raw Claude, so you keep the Claude Code workflow at a fraction of the token cost.
  • Set review scope. Optibot lets you configure which files trigger a full review vs. a lightweight pass, cutting unnecessary token use on trivial changes.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does Claude Code cost per code review?

Claude Code Review (Anthropic's GitHub integration) charges $10 to $25 per PR depending on diff size and complexity. For a team of 10 engineers submitting 8 PRs each per week, that comes to roughly $3,200 to $8,000 per month, before any other Claude usage.

Is Optibot cheaper than Claude Code for code reviews?

Yes, for almost any team size. Optibot charges a flat $29 per user per month (billed annually) with unlimited reviews. Claude Code Review charges $10 to $25 per PR. A 10-person team pays $290 per month with Optibot versus roughly $4,800 per month with Claude Code Review at a $15 average per review. The break-even is less than one PR per engineer per week.

What is the break-even point between Optibot and Claude Code for code reviews?

The break-even is less than one pull request per engineer per week. At $15 per Claude Code Review, Optibot breaks even at about 0.5 PRs per engineer per week. At $10 per review, the break-even is about 0.7 PRs per week. If your engineers open even one PR per week, Optibot is almost certainly cheaper.

Can I use Optibot inside Claude Code?

Yes. The Optibot Claude Code Skill routes code review calls through Optibot instead of raw Claude API calls, so you get Optibot's deep, multi-pass review engine at the flat $29 per user per month rate rather than paying per-token for each review.

Does Claude Code review quality improve with more tokens?

Not reliably. Claude Code reviewing its own PRs lacks cross-file business logic context and tends to produce surface-level comments. Optibot runs structured multi-pass reviews with persistent codebase context, catching 2x more breaking changes regardless of PR size or token budget.

How is monthly Claude Code token spend calculated?

Monthly spend equals: engineers multiplied by PRs per engineer per week, multiplied by 4 weeks, multiplied by cost per Claude Code Review. The calculator defaults to $15 per review as a mid-range estimate. Complex PRs touching many files can reach $25. Use the slider to model your actual cost based on your typical PR size.

What is Optibot?

Optibot is an AI code review tool that integrates with GitHub and GitLab to automatically review pull requests. It runs structured multi-pass reviews with persistent codebase context, catching breaking changes and business-logic issues across files. Pricing is $29 per user per month, billed annually, with unlimited reviews and no per-PR fees.

How do I reduce my Claude Code token spend on reviews?

The most direct way is to switch to a flat-rate reviewer like Optibot at $29 per user per month, which removes per-token billing entirely. Within Claude Code, you can reduce spend by limiting which files trigger a full review, using the Optibot Claude Code Skill to route reviews through Optibot instead of raw API calls, and batching small commits rather than reviewing every micro-commit separately.